black hat hacker hire(Black Hat Hacker)

Introduction：

1、Black Hat Hacker

2、From Malicious Hacking to Professional Hire

Black Hat Hacker ♂

　　How should we identify those individuals who attack a system with the permission of the system owner using unconventional means that are outside the boundaries of accepted methodologies? The term white hat hacker cannot work because they do not default to the use of unconventional attack methods. The term gray hat hacker cannot be used either, because the very definition of a gray hat hacker includes the use of illegal, or nonconsensual, attack methods against a target system or network. And because the attack is being done with permission, the moniker has to be excluded. To properly define such an individual, we need to come up with a new term; in this book, we will use the phrase “ninja hackers” and “Zukin” to identify these professionals, and investigate methods to become a ninja hacker ourselves.

　　The use of unconventional methods during a professional penetration test has both disadvantages and advantages. To understand both, we need to identify exactly what we are talking about when we refer to unconventional penetration test tactics. This book breaks out numerous unconventional attack methods into different chapters and discusses disguise, infiltration, impersonation, stealthy entrance, surveillance, espionage, escape, concealment, and even sabotage – areas that are often outside traditional penetration test methods. In those rare occasions where a methodology includes an unconventional attack within a penetration test, the penetration test engineer is often still restricted on how far he or she can go and what type of “damage” he or she can do against the target system, which can be something innocuous as placing a text file on the system, or something worse such as deleting database records. Again, restrictions placed on a penetration test engineer during an assessment prevent a full understanding of the true potential of a vulnerability and effectiveness of an attack vector, resulting in misleading results.

　　Restrictions on unconventional attack methods exist because of the fear of negatively impacting the target system, especially if the target system is mission-critical to a business unit. The system owners may be apprehensive about system crashes and other disastrous events if they allow attacks that are outside the industry?“best practice” to be performed against their assets. The types of attacks that are often conjured up by the imagination when thinking of unconventional attacks include denial-of-service attacks, and buffer overflows that crash a system; however, the traditional penetration testing attempts to produce results without doing any harm to systems and prefer to identify and demonstrate risks to administrators and management. If we are to integrate Ninpō and penetration testing into a coherent tactic, we have to acknowledge that attacks that crash a system or deny access to a system are inherently contrary to ninja hacking, because it draws attention to ourselves and our attack, which needs to be avoided at all costs, according to the traditions of Ninjutsu. One of the duties within the Togokure-ryu, as written by Toshitsugu Takamatsu, requires that the ninja2:

　　Move undetected into the enemy?area of influence and gather pertinent information about the enemy?strength and weaknesses. Escaping in a manner that prevents his presence from ever being known, the ninja then returns to his allies with the knowledge that will permit an attack at the most opportune time and place, leaving the enemy bewildered by the fact that the attack “just happened” to befall them at their weakest point.

　　Therefore, the methods of a ninja hacker, using unconventional attacks, could be used against any type of system – even critical systems – because the Zukin techniques should never affect the day-to-day operations of the target under attack, yet still identify vulnerabilities that could devastate the owners of the system if the vulnerabilities were exploited by nefarious attackers.

　　A negative side-effect of ninja hacking is that only a few potentially exploitable vulnerabilities are identified during the attack. The ability to avoid detection is threatened when multiple attacks are attempted against the target system. A Zukin needs to identify the best approach to infiltration and compromise before the attack, and carry out that attack to its (hopefully) successful conclusion. Only if unsuccessful in the initial attack would a ninja hacker attempt a second ingress (unless the second ingress was part of the attack plan, but we will get into that discussion in Chapter 3, “Strategies and Tactics”). The advantage to this method of attack is that resources are conserved and focused; the disadvantage is that only one attack vector is identified, tested, and exploited. However, this disadvantage does not invalidate a penetration test.

　　Although only a single attack vector is identified and used, there is great benefit in conducting a penetration test that uses highly skilled engineers, capable of great creativity and understanding on how to use unconventional methods, to gain entry into a target system or network. In addition, any success can be seen as an indication that an organization?incidence response, vulnerability identification, patch management, security policy, and security training programs need additional improvements. For an organization that is truly interested in improving its security posture, any successful attack – especially those provided by highly skilled engineers versed in the use of unconventional tactics – provides a wealth of valuable information that can be used to the advantage of the organization and its stakeholders.

From Malicious Hacking to Professional Hire ♂

　　There has been significant media coverage in the last few years about computer hacking and the people who use technology for malicious attacks. However, more and more companies are finding productive uses for individuals who are skilled hackers and programmers as expert security advisers. Anyone who has significant knowledge of cybersecurity and hacking practices is likely to find an employer who will benefit from their services.

　　Within the computer science industry, there are several different designations used for people who regularly try to exploit computer security systems. Recently, discussion has centered around "black hat" hackers due to the number of major security breaches at retailers and online organizations. These individuals use their computer knowledge to break into secured servers and often try to steal information for their own profit.

　　On the other hand, "white hat" hackers are those who choose to use their skills for benevolent purposes. This is where a computer science degree and the right company can lead to a very lucrative career in the technology industry.

　　As government regulation of information and customer profiles increases, and more companies seek ways to keep their own data secure, they are turning to these once demonized hackers to give them helpful hints. Many companies now employ or contract white hat professionals to help them conduct penetration testing on their own systems. These tests allow hackers to attempt breaking through company firewalls in a controlled environment, and point out weak points to their employers. They may also provide a number of solutions that will provide enhanced security and fewer data breaches in the future.

　　The number of job openings available to white hat hackers will continue to increase as computer hacking continues to be an ongoing issue in the world. With the increased use of mobile and cloud based technologies, new developers will need to stay ahead of the curve when dealing with potential risks in their security systems. This has led to a growth in the number of security engineering positions that have also opened up to people within the hacking community. In fact, the entire cybersecurity field is expected to grow by 18% in the next ten years, far out pacing many more traditional industries in job growth.

　　While computer hacking has had a bad reputation since the internet became a household mainstay, the reality is that there is viable and important work available to anyone who proves they have the skills to test and develop better security systems. Those individuals who choose to take on this kind of work will have the opportunity to lead the charge against malicious attacks, and will have many opportunities with a wide range of customers including retailers and the government itself. A computer science degree and experience working within controlled penetration testing parameters can be the way to a lifelong career path.

Related questions

Hiring a hacker on the dark web is not only illegal but also unethical and fraught with significant risks. Here's a structured overview of the considerations and consequences:

Key Considerations:

1. Legal Implications:

   • Illegality: Engaging in hacking activities, including hiring someone to do so, violates laws globally (e.g., the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the U.S.). Consequences include fines, imprisonment, and a permanent criminal record.
   • Law Enforcement Monitoring: Dark web marketplaces are often monitored by authorities. Participation increases exposure to legal action.

2. Ethical Concerns:

   • Privacy Violations: Hacking infringes on individuals' or organizations' privacy and can cause irreparable harm.
   • Moral Responsibility: Supporting cybercrime perpetuates illegal activities and undermines trust in digital systems.

3. Practical Risks:

   • Scams: Many "hackers" on the dark web are fraudsters. Payments (often in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Monero) are typically non-refundable, and services are rarely delivered.
   • Security Vulnerabilities: Even with tools like Tor or encrypted communication, technical missteps can expose your identity.
   • Reputation Damage: Association with cybercrime can lead to personal or professional repercussions.

Alternatives to Consider:

• Cybersecurity Professionals: For legitimate concerns (e.g., securing systems, recovering accounts), consult licensed experts.
• Legal Channels: Report issues to law enforcement or ethical hacking platforms (e.g., bug bounty programs).
• Education: Learn about cybersecurity through courses or certifications (e.g., CompTIA Security+, CEH) to address concerns legally.

Conclusion:

The risks of hiring a hacker—legal, ethical, and practical—far outweigh any perceived benefits. Always seek lawful and ethical solutions to address cybersecurity needs. If researching for educational purposes, focus on understanding threats to improve defense mechanisms, not to engage in illegal activities.