hacker earth hirings are original

Introduction：

2、Climate Denial Group Aided Legal Defense of Alleged Exxon Hacker-for-Hire

Genuine Hackers For Hire In India ♂

　　The world is increasingly wary of hacking firms, which often use unlicensed software to gain access to confidential information. This trend is exacerbated by the proliferation of sophisticated espionage tools. India is home to some of the largest and best-known hacking firms in the world, including the well-known Black Hats, who are known for targeting corporate clients. Among them are companies such as ViSalus, which is suing Facebook over a $925 million judgment for robocalls.

　　In India, the term hack for hire covers a wide range of services. The target of hacking depends on the kind of service requested, but most often, it involves low-level hacking. While there are few avenues for an ethical hacker in India, talented upstarts and engineers have been exploring the dark side for some time. The number of these professionals is on the rise. But before becoming a hacker, make sure to understand your role in the industry and your potential targets.

　　HaaS businesses have become a lucrative business for many part-time and freelance hackers. One such How much does it cost to hire a hacker? receives between 150 and 200 queries a month from blackmailing victims. The managing director of the agency receives around 150 to 200 emails a month. There is a demand for such services in India and the market is set to grow further in the future. It will continue to grow as India's digital economy continues to expand. This means there will be more opportunities for hacking services in the country. The biggest payouts will be from foreign clients paying in dollars.

　　The market for hacking services in India has grown significantly over the past year. A recent study conducted by Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG) reveals a thriving industry in the country, including more than a dozen firms. One of the most prominent examples is a firm in Delhi called Belltrox Infotech Services Pvt. Ltd. It is a company that advertises corporate espionage on its website.

　　The Reuters report cites several instances in which Indian hackers were involved in lawsuits where they obtained information about the litigating parties. The Nigerian government, for example, sued the heirs of an Italian businessman to gain control of a major oil company. The Indian hackers sent out malicious emails containing phishing codes to the targeted people. They then used this information to steal email credentials and other data. It's no wonder so many companies are looking for genuine hackers for hire India.

　　Similarly, BellTroX InfoTech Services was engaged in hacking cases and targeted government officials, casino tycoons in the Bahamas, and prominent investors in the US. In one such case, BellTroX's founder, Narayan Gupta, was charged with hacking and declared a fugitive. The US Department of Justice declined to comment on the current status of the case or whether extradition of the accused has been requested.

　　In one case, a hacker's friend received a call from a potential client. This person was looking for a list of the partners of a company called Urban Company. The list included names of service personnel and details of how to contact them. He was willing to pay him Rs40,000 in bitcoins for the list. While this is a rare case, it's a good indicator of the type of work that can be done by hackers.

　　There are also several India-based cyber defense training outfits that use the Appin name, which once grew into a franchise model. After a 2013 report linked the firm to alleged hacking, the company nearly disappeared from the Internet. Its alumni, however, formed competing firms. In 2016, CyberRoot Risk Advisory Private Ltd., based in the Delhi suburb of Gurugram, was set up. The name of this company reflects the fact that it has a reputation of putting cyber security training on the mainstream.

Climate Denial Group Aided Legal Defense of Alleged Exxon Hacker-for-Hire ♂

　　An Israeli private investigator wanted by U.S. authorities for allegedly carrying out a hack-and-leak operation commissioned on behalf of ExxonMobil is fighting against his extradition to a Brooklyn, NY, detention center.

　　During a packed hearing last week at London’s Westminster Magistrates’ Court attended by DeSmog, lawyers for Amit Forlit used a legal strategy that one climate accountability advocate is referring to as “bizarre.”

　　The defense is arguing that Forlit, who is accused of being hired by the Washington D.C.-based public relations and lobbying firm DCI Group to illegally hack into the emails of environmental activists and others involved with climate change litigation against Exxon, shouldn’t be extradited on the grounds that the charges against him are politically motivated.

　　Last Wednesday was the first time Exxon and DCI were officially named in connection with the allegations – part of the defense’s claim that Forlit is “a form of collateral damage” in the legal pursuit of ExxonMobil.

　　To support his case, Forlit’s lawyers sought to present evidence from “expert” witness Scott Walter, president of a conservative U.S. think tank called the Capital Research Center (CRC) that for years publicly argued that the science of climate change is faulty and uncertain – including publishing a post last year disputing that “climate change” is “settled science.”

　　In his affidavit, Walter claimed that current efforts to hold ExxonMobil accountable in court for lying to the public about the dangers of climate change are at their core a political project connected to the U.S. Democratic Party.

　　Forlit is facing up to 45 years in prison for allegedly carrying out cyberattacks and hacking against groups and individuals involved with efforts to file lawsuits against ExxonMobil for misleading the public over the impact of burning fossil fuels on the earth’s climate, and spearheading public communications efforts to undermine the science.

　　Drawing on Walter’s affidavit, Forlit’s UK-based lawyer Rachel Scott stated in court, “we submit that these lawsuits are politically motivated.”

　　“It’s a bizarre strategy,” said Kert Davies, director of special investigations at the nonprofit Center of Climate Integrity, which has been involved with climate litigation. “Trying to claim that this guy is facing political persecution when, in fact, he was allegedly paid large sums of money to execute a massive hacking operation aimed at hundreds of employees at environmental nonprofit organizations and even those people’s spouses and kids.” Davies was one of the 128 individuals targeted by the hackers.

　　On a grey January day, journalists packed into the London courtroom gallery where prosecutors representing the U.S. Department of Justice argued that Forlit should be extradited to New York. Upon his extradition, Forlit faces a federal indictment charging him “with three offences consisting of conspiracy to commit computer hacking, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and wire fraud,” according to prosecution documents. “The maximum sentences are five, 20, and 20 years’ imprisonment, respectively.” The indictment has not been made public.

　　Wearing casual trousers and a blue shirt, Forlit watched from the side of the courtroom as lawyers argued about the political implications of his case. Acting on behalf of U.S. authorities, lawyer Adam Payter, with the firm 6KBW, took aim at the affidavit from CRC’s Walter, calling it “opinion presented as fact” and arguing that it was “inadmissible” as evidence.

　　Payter presented written material from the CRC’s website claiming that “environmentalist groups” and others are attempting to “undermine Americans’ freedoms.” The lawyer pointed out that CRC has on multiple occasions professed skepticism about human-caused climate change and advocated against solutions to the crisis by publishing a newsletter titled “Green Watch,” which outlines these positions. Payter then informed the court that, according to publicly available filings, Walter’s group has previously received funding from ExxonMobil – a conflict of interest Walter did not disclose in his affidavit.

　　In a blow to Forlit’s defense, District Judge John McGarva ruled that Walter’s affidavit could not be admitted as evidence.

　　Contrary to the defense’s claims that the charges against Forlit are politically motivated, Forlit “has been sought to be prosecuted for straight-forward criminal allegations that he orchestrated the hacking of persons for money,” the prosecution argued in a legal document submitted to the court.

　　“That Forlit, as the alleged orchestrator of a hacking scheme designed to politicise Climate Change Litigation,” should claim that he cannot be extradited and prosecuted because this Climate Change Litigation is politicised, “may be thought ironic,” stated Payter in a written submission to the court.

　　While the judge dismissed Walter’s statement, he agreed to consider supplementary reports and other material provided by Walter. This supplementary material included a report by Christopher Horner a former senior fellow with the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), another group whose representatives have historically expressed climate skeptic viewpoints. According to publicly available data, CEI received at least $2.1 million in funding from ExxonMobil between 1997 and 2006. In 2018, when CEI published Horner’s report, five of CEI’s eleven board members had links to groups funded by present or historic players in the fossil fuel industry.

　　In court, Payter stated that he would like to add further context on CEI on the final day of the hearing scheduled next month.

　　The allegations against Forlit come from a Department of Justice investigation started in 2018. According to federal investigators, Forlit was the leader of several Israeli-based intelligence-gathering firms that specialized in “offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, including computer intrusions.”

　　In a court filing, Payter alleged that Forlit’s firms were paid $16 million between 2013 and 2018 by a Washington, D.C.? lobbying firm, which, in turn, was acting on behalf of one of the world’s biggest oil companies, a company based in Irving, Texas, that wanted to undermine groups connected to climate litigation.

　　Scott, the lawyer representing Forlit, filed papers that named the names that Payter, the U.S.government’s lawyer, did not; she wrote that the hacking effort “is alleged to have been commissioned by DCI Group, a lobbying firm representing ExxonMobil…”

　　Some of the specific hacking initiatives were led by another Israeli private investigator named Aviram Azari, who oversaw hackers in India who in turn illegally accessed the electronic accounts of environmental campaigners. Azari was arrested in 2019, and sentenced to 80 months’ imprisonment after pleading guilty to computer hacking, identity theft, and wire fraud. (Azari’s sentence incorporated lengthy time in pre-sentence custody, and on January 3, he was released from prison and briefly transferred to the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, after which he was sent to Israel.)

　　Prosecutors contend that DCI provided the hacked documents to Exxon and selected media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal. Exxon has used the allegedly stolen materials – which include a proposed legal strategy against the company – in its defense against ongoing climate litigation in Hawaii.

　　Both ExxonMobil and DCI have previously stated that they were not involved in the hacking operation.

　　Forlit was arrested in April 2024 under an Interpol Red Notice at London’s Heathrow Airport as he was attempting to board a flight to Israel. He was released on bail, forced to surrender his passport and make a security payment of ￡200,000 ($257,370).

　　The allegations in this case suggest oil and gas producers are willing to go to extreme lengths to discredit their environmental opponents, explained Robert Brulle, visiting research professor of environment and society at Brown University.

　　“The climate change countermovement is a sophisticated effort, involving multiple organizations engaging in a wide variety of strategies to obstruct climate mitigation efforts and to maintain business as usual,” he wrote in an email to DeSmog. “Climate litigation represents a threat to the business model of fossil fuel corporations, and so opposition to it is a core part of their efforts.”

　　The hearing will continue in early February.

1. Trusted by Enterprises

HackerEarth partners with well-known companies (e.g., Amazon, Walmart, GE, Adobe) to streamline their hiring processes. These collaborations validate its credibility.

2. Real Job Opportunities

Companies post actual job openings on HackerEarth’s platform. Candidates participate in assessments or hackathons to showcase their skills, and top performers are often shortlisted for interviews.

3. Anti-Fraud Measures

While no platform is 100% immune to scams, HackerEarth verifies companies using its services. Job descriptions and requirements are typically vetted to ensure legitimacy.

4. Transparent Process

The platform provides clear guidelines for assessments, hackathons, and hiring workflows. Candidates receive direct communication from employers or HackerEarth itself.

5. User Reviews

Many developers have secured jobs via HackerEarth. Check platforms like Glassdoor or LinkedIn for testimonials from candidates who participated in hiring challenges.

Red Flags to Watch For:

Never pay to apply: Legitimate companies on HackerEarth do not ask candidates for money.
Verify employer details: Research the company separately before sharing sensitive information.

Final Take:

HackerEarth is a genuine platform for tech hiring. However, always exercise due diligence when engaging with any third-party service or employer. If a job posting seems suspicious, report it to HackerEarth’s support team for verification.

For more details, visit HackerEarth's Hiring Solutions.

你可能想看：

hacker earth hirings challenges are original quorea