Introduction：
1、Top 11 HackerRank Alternatives For Every Recruiter in 2025
2、Top 11 Hackerrank Alternatives in 2024 for Hiring Developers
Top 11 HackerRank Alternatives For Every Recruiter in 2025 ♂
Recruiters need technology to solve their problems. And now, they have multiple options to choose from. That can sometimes be both a boon and a curse.
With the growing competition in the job market, recruitment is challenging, and there is no denying that. We might as well sign it and give it to you.
For the same reason, recruiters look for ways to identify the most skilled and knowledgeable candidates. An effective method is using pre-hiring assessments to evaluate a candidate’s or multiple candidates’ job-specific skills (tech and non-tech).
HackerRank is a popular solution that offers technical assessments and remote interview features, however, recruiters need more than that. And, for this purpose, we have compiled a list of 9 alternate solutions to HackerRank in this blog.
HackerRank provides technical assessments and remote hiring interview solutions for hiring tech talent—for developers to be specific.
With their suite of solutions, recruiters can plan their tech hiring by screening, interviewing, and ranking developers based on technical skills and competencies for 30+ roles.
Candidates, on the other hand, can practice coding, prepare for interviews, and get hired by companies.
Additionally, they offer solutions for Remote Hiring and University Hiring.?
HackerRank offers solutions specific to tech hiring but you can choose from many alternatives with additional features.
If you are wondering whether HackerRank can detect cheating, the short answer is yes it can.
Continue to compare HackerRank's proctoring features with top technical and talent assessment tools.
HackerRank G2 Rating: 4.5/5Relevant coding challenges: Candidates find the current pattern of coding assessments to be above their level of competency.Flexible billing options: You need a platform without a subscription or lock-in and the cost per test attempt on HackerRank is too high for you.Assessments for non-tech skills: While HackerRank is a Leader for technical assessments, it does not offer non-technical assessments. You need an alternative that has assessments to evaluate both tech and non-tech skills.More anti-cheating features: You need additional proctoring features such as detecting audio, enabling auto-submit on tab switch, and capturing screenshots of the switched tabs.
If any of those reasons struck a chord with you, read on, discover more solutions, and find the best HackerRank alternative for your business.HackerRank Programming Test Preview
Equip is a leading technical assessment solution. It offers advanced test types across the whole hiring process.
On Equip you can test for multiple skills such as Web Development, Programming, Sales & Marketing, Data Analysis, Customer Success, and many more skills.Equip's Programming Test Preview
These skills are mapped to different roles. For example, for hiring a Python Developer Equip can automatically create an assessment to test the candidate's skill level for Python, Data Structures and Algorithms, Aptitude, and Git. Similarly, a Digital Marketer's assessment includes tests for skills like Facebook and Instagram Ads, Google Ads, Digital Marketing, Aptitude, and English Language.
Teams can utilize Equip’s vast Question Libraries, and create Custom Tests that enable them to hire Developers, Sales, Marketing and Customer Support Executives, Data Analysts and more. That’s a lot, right? All in one platform!Customization: Flexibility in creating Custom Tests. With Equip, you can create a Custom Test once, and use it for multiple assessments, all with a single click.
HackerRank offers Custom tests, however, questions from a Custom Test are individually added to the library. The questions will have to be added later individually which can be rather cumbersome.Continue reading about Customization: Why MountBlue Switched from HackerRank to Equip?
Test types and Question types: Equip offers a wide range of test types, such as Programming tests, Quizzes, and Video Responses, and it also has unique question types such as voice input and transcription questions. It has more than 10 questions types to choose from.
Unique Questions: Equip has a Randomized Template Feature that prevents candidates from making the questions publicly available. What’s more? When you upload a question template, it will show different variants of the same question to different users, thereby preventing chances of cheating.More Proctoring Features: All of Equip’s assessments are AI-proctored using AutoProctor (built by the same team that built Equip). In addition to the proctoring features on HackerRank, these are the bonus features Equip offers: capturing screenshots of switched tabs, capturing random photos throughout the test, enforcing fullscreen mode during the test to prevent cheating, recording the candidates' screen while they take the assessment, detecting multiple faces, recording audio, and disabling copy-paste.?Pricing: On Equip, you can pay-as-you-go based on your usage without paying for a subscription or annual contract. It scales well for small businesses to enterprises without spending fixed recurring costs when hiring slows down. Need to see the numbers before you believe it? We have built a pricing calculator to compare HackerRank's pricing and how much you save using Equip!HackerRank and Equip Pricing Comparison
?Equip G2 Rating: 4.8/5
Read more: An in-depth comparison of Equip and HackerRank
Equip does not have a subscription fee or a lock-in period, and you only pay per candidate.
When you sign up on Equip, you can evaluate 10 candidates for free. You don't need to enter your card details for this. The pricing is $1 per candidate (or less when you bulk purchase credits) and the credits never expire.
Both Equip and HackerRank offer these features in the Programming Tests:
1. Selecting a language: Candidates can choose the language they want to write their code in.Timer: The programming tests are timed and the candidates must submit their code before the timer runs out.Test Cases: Both platforms provide some sample test cases and custom test cases that the candidates can run their code against before submitting it.Anti-cheating features: The tests are proctored and the candidates' screens are recorded to detect any malpractice and attempt to cheat in the test such as switching to another application, talking to multiple people during the test etc.Auto-grading: The code submission is automatically evaluated after submission and the test report include the scores for it.
HackerEarth is an online assessment technical recruitment tool that enables you to create tests and evaluate candidates to find the right fit for your team.
HackerEarth assessments are found to be suitable for senior roles whereas HackerRank assessments are more beginner-friendly for entry-level hiring.HackerEarth has a learning and development platform for employees that provides insights into your teams' skill gaps and helps them upskill at par with industry-leading tech teams.
?HackerEarth G2 Rating: 4.4/5
HackerEarth’s pricing is divided between Products and Bundles.
Unlike HackerRank, HackerEarth does not provide a monthly billing option. All plans require an annual upfront payment. Features such as white labelling, APIs, and integrations are only available on the Enterprise plan and not for the Startup plan.
HackerEarth offers a 14-day free trial without any strings attached (aka Credit Card).
Compare Equip and HackerEarth
iMocha offers talent development teams a unified skills intelligence platform that allows them to make data-driven, skills-based, bias-free decisions from hiring to retirement.
They offer a bunch of solutions across categories such as Talent Acquisition, Talent Development, AI-English Pro, Skill Library, and an eLearning solution.You can conduct assessments for non-technical skillsOffers Analysis of Question Difficulty LevelsAI-enabled One-Way Video InterviewAI-LogicBox - Innovative & Patented Question TypeRecruiter Performance ReportVideo Proctoring with analysis
iMocha G2 Rating: 4.4/5
Their pricing structure is comprehensive across three categories:Talent AcquisitionTalent DevelopmentCampus/University Hiring
The pricing is then further divided between ‘professional’, and ‘enterprise’ plans for each of the categories.
iMocha offers a free plan, however, it requires companies to get in touch with them and it is not listed on their website.
Compare Equip and iMocha
An online platform, Mettl offers solutions for use cases such as Online examinations, and Hiring & Learning and Development.For analytics, Mettl has in-depth skill, candidate, and group-level analytics with benchmarks.Advanced proctoring and session recordingsMettl provides Personality, Behavior, Cognitive & Domain Assessments.
Mettl G2 Rating: 4.4/5
Pricing information is not listed on the website. Get in touch with their sales team for pricing and a free trial.
Compare Equip and Mettl
CodeSignal is a technical interview and assessment solution that offers job simulation technology in the hiring process.
According to G2, CodeSignal offers higher user satisfaction than HackerRank. Codesignal’s advantages over HackerRank:CodeSignal has Predictive Coding ScoreOffers Advanced IDEOffers Dynamic live preview for frontend & mobile tasks in IDEWhat’s more? It also offers Integrated terminal, Coding playback, and Project-based tasks (e.g. Mobile React-native)Offers complete support for building full-stack applicationsTemplates & test reviews for structured interviews
CodeSignal G2 Rating: 4.5/5
CodeSignal's pricing is segmented based on hiring talent and upskilling developers but the pricing plans are not transparent for hiring talent. The pricing per seat starts at $24.29/month per user when billed annually for the Develop Skills plans.
Coderbyte is a platform for technical assessments, interviews, and projects.Assessments for non-technical rolesAdditional test types such as Spreadsheet tests and Question types such as Long Answer and Video ResponseMasking coding challenge titles to prevent candidates from searching for solutionsBig-O analysis for coding challenge submissions
Coderbyte G2 Rating: 4.4/5?
Coderbyte has a 14-day free trial like HackerRank. The monthly plan starts at $199 rather than the Starter Plan at $100/month on HackerRank. Coderbyte has pay-as-you-go pricing and does not restrict the number of candidates assessed per plan. The pay-per-candidate pricing starts at $10 per candidate and the credits expire within a year. A free trial requires a work email and a credit card.
Codility is a technical hiring platform for companies to test the coding skills of developers and make evidence-based hiring decisions.
Users report a better experience with setting up Codility and meeting their requirements compared to HackerRank.
?Codility G2 rating: 4.6/5?
Both Codility and HackerRank have a Starter Plan at $100 per month which includes 1 platform user. You can invite 15 candidates on Codility's Starter Plan whereas HackerRank's Starter Plan only has 10 candidate invites. The cost per candidate is $15 on Codility which is 25% cheaper than HackerRank.
Vervoe helps employers to hire based on merit, not background.
It replaces the traditional hiring process with skills assessments and gives every candidate an opportunity to showcase their talent by doing job-related tasks.Soft skill testingAI gradingMore question types such as Audio, Video, Spreadsheets, etc.Automated candidate rejectionShareable candidate reports
Vervoe G2 Rating: 4.6/5?
Vervoe does not offer monthly billing. The cheapest pricing plan is Pay & Go at $228 per year. You can only create one assessment and the candidate invitations are limited to 100 on this plan. HackerRank has the option to purchase additional test attempts at $20 per attempt. One of the biggest limitations with Vervoe's pricing is that you cannot purchase additional assessments or candidate attempts.
TestGorilla is made for pre-employment assessment tests to identify the best candidates for tech and non-tech roles.
Also read: Top 10 TestGorilla Alternatives?Assessments for non-technical skillsFree forever planIntuitive interface
?TestGorilla G2 rating: 4.5/5
TestGorilla has a Free Forever plan with 5 free tests and 5 custom questions. TestGorilla's pricing increases with an increase in the employee count of the company. Monthly payment options are not available for Indian customers.
Compare TestGorilla and Equip
WeCP streamlines technical hiring by offering a unified platform to evaluate candidates' software engineering, cloud, and data science skills. It integrates seamlessly with ATS and onboarding tools, automating candidate assessments and enabling quick, skill-based decisions. Similar to HackerRank, WeCP also provides features like coding tests and codepair video interviews.Unified Platform for Technical Skills: WeCP focuses on evaluating technical skills across software engineering, cloud, DevOps, and enterprise tools in a single, cohesive platform. HackerRank offers similar capabilities but is heavily coding-centric, making WeCP potentially better for broader technical roles.Simplified Workflows with ATS Integration: WeCP seamlessly integrates with leading ATS platforms, automating workflows like inviting candidates for tests and managing results. While HackerRank also integrates with ATS, WeCP emphasizes streamlining hiring cycles with fewer manual steps.
?WeCP G2 rating: 4.8/5 across 80+ reviewsPricing Structure: WeCP offers a lower entry point with its Premium Plan at $240 per month compared to HackerRank's Starter Plan at $199 per month; however, the included features and credits differ.Credits vs. Attempts: WeCP uses a credit-based system, with each candidate assessment consuming one credit, while HackerRank allocates a set number of candidate attempts per month, with additional costs for extra attempts.Licenses: HackerRank specifies the number of recruiter and developer licenses per plan, whereas WeCP's plans do not explicitly mention user licenses.Question Bank Access: HackerRank provides access to a larger pool of questions in higher-tier plans, with over 6,000 questions in the Custom Plan, while WeCP's question bank size is not specified.Additional Features: HackerRank's Custom Plan includes advanced features like API access and SSO, which are not detailed in WeCP's publicly available plans.
eSkill specializes in customizable employment assessments to minimize hiring errors, reduce recruiting costs, and enhance outcomes. With a large assessment catalog, video response options, and EEOC compliance, eSkill ensures tailored tests for diverse job requirements.Customizable Assessments: eSkill allows organizations to fully customize tests by combining proprietary and pre-built questions, tailoring assessments to specific job roles and requirements. HackerRank provides a vast question library but less flexibility for customization.Broad Skills Coverage: eSkill caters to both technical and non-technical roles, including soft skills, customer service, and language proficiency, making it suitable for diverse hiring needs. HackerRank focuses primarily on technical roles.EEOC Compliance: With a perfect EEOC compliance record for over 20 years, eSkill ensures that its assessments are legally defensible and unbiased. This is a critical advantage for organizations prioritizing compliance in their hiring process.
?eSkill G2 rating: 4.5/5 across 300+ reviews
eSkill's pricing is available on request but some source claim it starts at $250/month. Pricing Transparency: HackerRank provides clear monthly pricing for its Starter and Pro plans, while eSkill's pricing is customized and requires direct consultation.Licensing Structure: HackerRank specifies the number of recruiter and developer licenses per plan, whereas eSkill's plans focus on assessment features and customization without explicit mention of user licenses.Assessment Volume: HackerRank's plans include a set number of candidate attempts per month, with additional costs for extra attempts. eSkill's plans do not publicly specify assessment limits, suggesting potential flexibility based on organizational needs.Customization and Integration: Both platforms offer customization and integration capabilities, with eSkill emphasizing tailored assessments and HR system integrations, and HackerRank providing API access and SSO in its Custom plan.
Equip is better than HackerRank because of its:Diversity of skills assessed with its Question BanksAffordable pricing, no subscription fees, and lifetime validity of creditsAdvanced anti-cheating features
Choosing the right pre-hiring platform is crucial for companies looking to hire skilled professionals. With the rise of remote work and the need for technical skills, pre-hiring assessments are an essential tool for recruiters to evaluate a candidate's abilities.
With the funding winter and recession on the rise, recruiters now need to focus more on saving both time and money. And startups are always in the crunch for both.
It’s important to address the elephant in the room (read: this blog).
All assessment tools listed above have tremendous capabilities and ability to fulfill requirements for various companies, but not all of them are efficient. Why?
Most of them only offer technical assessments, are limited in their proctoring capabilities, and have limitations with customization.
We can almost hear them say, “We aren’t for everybody,” and that’s okay.
But, as recruiters, you need to optimize for time. This is where you would need to prioritize selecting a screening tool that offers you more than just tech assessments. This way, you will not run to another tool when your company needs to hire for non-tech roles.
This is one of the reasons why Equip was built. To help recruiters, founders, and leaders save time and conduct their candidate screening with its automated skill assessments.
If that sounds like something that might meet your hiring goals, watch how you can create an Equip assessment in 90 seconds.
View Equip Demo
A HackerRank Assessment is used by companies to evaluate the technical skills of candidates through coding tests and challenges. It covers various domains like algorithms, data structures, artificial intelligence, and more. Companies customize assessments to measure specific skills relevant to the job. Candidates solve problems within a given time, helping employers gauge their coding ability, problem-solving skills, and efficiency.
If you use HackerRack for hiring, screening, and technical interviews, you can access it for free during a 14-day free trial. HackerRank is free for developers to practice and improve their coding skills.
Top 11 Hackerrank Alternatives in 2024 for Hiring Developers ♂
HackerRank paved the way for recruiting coding talent with its innovative testing, but several other players have entered the technical skills testing market in recent years, meaning they’re not your only choice.
Today’s hiring managers are looking for more specialized testing with diverse assessment types and capabilities. They’re also shifting towards all-in-one hiring systems, consolidating tests, interviews, and even candidate sourcing under a single software.
The reason for the shift? Simply administering high-quality coding tests isn’t enough when recruiting tech talent these days. Recruiters want to assess technical skills alongside soft skills. If that’s what you’re after, too, HackerRank might not be the best option for you.
So, let’s explore the best HackerRank alternatives to help you debug your tech hiring process.
When it first entered the market, HackerRank broke new ground by simulating real-world coding challenges. Companies could set assignments based on actual projects, gaining insights into how candidates perform at work.
While that’s great, the platform currently doesn’t have great reviews for users needing to assess other skills like software development, system-building, management, or communication. So, what should you look for in next-generation tools?
The best testing systems feature diverse question libraries because, with more questions available, you can build specific tests for each position.
Ideally, hiring teams can build coding tests for all major programming languages, frameworks, and difficulty levels. And look for regularly updated questions set by industry experts. This ensures tests are relevant to cutting-edge industry needs.
Candidates’ skills requirements will be very different. For example, some engineering roles are almost exclusively technical, demanding a narrow critical skill base. Other hybrid roles mix coding, system architecture, and personnel management.
Customizable tests make it easy to tailor tests and assess every skill the role requires. You can match candidates with specific or focus on specific languages or software packages.
Especially with so many different and languages to test for, customizable assessments are also essential for providing a more accurate measure of a candidate’s abilities and fit for the role.
Applied testing is also vital. Older systems tend to focus on examination-style assessments, but these tell you little about how candidates will perform in the workplace. High-level testing platforms solve this problem by using real-world scenarios to assess problem-solving and communication skills.
Testing analytics provide invaluable feedback about candidate performance and general hiring. With relevant data structures, you can make informed and refine how you assess future candidates.
Advanced testing systems include automated scoring and candidate feedback, as well as long-term performance tracking. Hiring managers can use them to identify trends or weak spots and take action to improve their sourcing systems.
Finally, leading testing platforms integrate seamlessly with application tracking systems, HR databases, and general workflows to help you streamline the hiring process.
Hiring teams should be able to automatically schedule custom tests for those candidates who progress after the screening phase. They should also be able to communicate about promising candidates and provide selection panels with high-quality data to inform hiring decisions.
Most HackerRank competitors fill specific niches in the recruitment landscape. It’s worth taking the time to evaluate them properly, as the right choice for one company may not suit another. Luckily for you, we’ve done the heavy lifting and have reviewed the 11 best alternatives and what they offer.
Top Tip: Use the curated list below to compare HackerRank substitutes. Keep in mind your current and future hiring needs. And remember to factor in costs, as large-scale coding tests can challenge your recruitment budget.
We don’t want to sound biased, but is a great starting point, especially if you’re looking for a coding test platform with ease of use and speed at the forefront.
Toggl’s ATS features include candidate filtering, video intros, communication capabilities, and more. Recruiters can create smooth pipelines for every candidate, ensuring a consistent experience. The process is quick and seamless for candidates and companies alike.
We also combine coding tests with all-around assessments, like personality or , for more hybrid roles. For instance, companies can assess technical abilities as well as soft skills like managing teams or solving problems.
Who is it for? Companies that need to assess every aspect of a candidate’s skills and personality are looking for a more robust ATS-like hiring software than just a tool. Toggl Hire’s versatility helps you choose skilled hires who fit your business culture. That’s hard to achieve with other solutions.
Toggl’s offers transparent and affordable prices. The free account lets you test Toggl with three users, while the Basic package costs $25 per month and includes 20 invites. Premium costs $100 monthly, while Business costs $469 monthly and has no limitations.
Codility has been around since 2009, making it one of the most experienced providers on this list. The testing platform has three core aims: enabling remote assessments, reducing hiring bias, and improving hiring speed.
Tests are pitched at relatively advanced levels, featuring live coding tasks. You can set up interviews via CodeLive, and test results also feed directly into ATS systems via the Codility API.
Who is it for? Codility is useful for high-end hiring in specialized roles, especially senior engineers.
The Starter package costs $1,200 annually and includes 120 candidate invites. Above that, Scale costs $5,000 annually (or $500 monthly) and includes full access to the assessment library.
Created “by developers for developers,” CodeSignal offers professionally designed tests across over 70 programming languages. Recruiters and candidates benefit from the intuitive UI and the accurate plagiarism checker.
CodeSignal shines with its simulations of working environments, making it easier for companies to upskill existing employees with tests replicating actual projects. They can also screen initial applicants or integrate coding tests into interview assessments.
Users, however, have reported technical issues, including unexplained outages and a faulty code editor. Perhaps more importantly, CodeSignal’s is often criticized, along with the poor quality of feedback after a candidate finishes their test.
Who is it for? CodeSignal is ideal for recruiting developers with clearly defined work tasks.
The CodeSignal website does not include prices for the Enterprise subscription. Individual packages start at $24 per month, but costs for hiring teams are much higher.
TestGorilla?helps companies identify?tech talent?via diverse tests, ranked shortlists, ATS integration, and other bias-reducing features. You can also test cultural fit and skills like communication, generating a rounded view of each applicant.
However, TestGorilla’s performance doesn’t always match its advertised capabilities. The live coding system is buggy and unreliable, and customer service support has been criticized for slow responses. The pricing model is rigid, and it’s easy to buy more features than you need.
Proctoring tools provide extra assurance, but they are also slightly invasive, resembling candidate surveillance. On the plus side, video interviews work well. TestGorilla also makes it easy to review results and make selections.
Who is it for? Great for companies that need to fill DevOps teams with coding skills and ensure a decent cultural fit.
The free account lets you create five tests and invite unlimited candidates. Beyond that, Starter packages cost $75 monthly. Pro costs $115 monthly and includes ATS integration. It should be the best option for larger businesses.
HR Avatar offers a unique approach to pre-employment assessments. Its tests feature animated avatars who lead candidates through scenarios or role-related tests, creating an immersive and fun user experience.
HR Avatar’s focus isn’t entirely on coding, though, and doesn’t let you focus on specific languages or DevOps systems. Instead, Tests focus on pre-defined roles, covering software development, operating systems architecture, and many related fields.
On the positive side, the combination of technical and helps to discover more about how candidates might perform. Video interviews, remote proctoring, and automated reference checks also create a smooth hiring pipeline.
Who is it for? Companies that focus on competencies over coding skills.
HR Avatar is not cheap. Single candidate packages cost $50, packs of 50 cost $1,430 while screening 500 applicants costs $12,300.
WeCreateProblems is an assessment platform with problem-solving at its heart. WeCP sets work scenarios based on real-life challenges, including hundreds of programming tasks.
The interface assesses how candidates solve problems and approach coding challenges (not just their outputs). AI-powered proctoring identifies cheating. Personalized communications add a human touch to what can be a stressful experience.
Using WeCP, hiring professionals can automate assessment delivery, allowing testing at scale. Efficient testing frees up time for interviews or other screening measures. Plus, the testing library is also huge, with questions for every role or hiring process.
Who is it for? Businesses that prefer testing problem-solving skills above pure technical skills.
500 credits cost $2,388 per year. One credit represents a single candidate process, including tests, proctoring, ATS integration, and video interviews.
HackerEarth emerged from the hackathon scene, aiming to boost hacking skills and general coding expertise. The site remains a hub for hackathons and industry meet-ups, with a global community of over 7.6 million members.
Its assessment module has also become a popular way to assess candidates and identify elite developers. While users can ask over 17,000 questions and test 900+ skills, creating testing templates for individual roles is tricky.
If you have a specialist developer role in mind, the interface works great. Plug in languages or critical skills, and you’re good to go.
Who is it for? Businesses focused purely on coding and nothing else. Testing soft skills is not a HackerEarth specialty. Think of it as a technical testing tool, not a fully-rounded hiring ally.
The 14-day free trial gives a taste of what HackerEarth offers. After that, prices increase quite a bit. Enterprises can expect to spend $419 per month.
iMocha?claims to maintain the?biggest?tech skills testing library, covering over 3,000 skills. Not only that, but iMocha also offers functional skills testing. For instance, you can test Salesforce development or supply chain management.
Functional testing complements aptitude and personality tests, communication assessments, and customization. Overall, this up-and-comer does everything HackerRank does and a bit more.
However, there are some issues. Analyzing test results is complex, and the UI is generally cluttered. Personalizing test invites and communications could be simpler. Users also can’t fully customize test scoring or timing. You have to accept iMocha’s templates in most cases.
Who is it for? Companies testing large numbers of candidates with relatively low user experience expectations.
iMocha offers a free trial, which is good. However, the website does not include transparent pricing information.
Codeaid?offers more in-depth coding tests that typically last five times longer than HackerRank’s. Extended tests deliver?deep insights into candidate skills. However, they make Codeaid slightly unwieldy for fast and efficient hiring.
The best aspect of Codeaid is its ability to mimic workflows. Tests immerse candidates in realistic environments, challenging them to engage with on-the-job tasks.
Assignments assess problem-solving, programming language levels, design pattern usage, and more. Proctoring systems guard against the use of ChatGPT and AI tools. Candidate outputs also translate instantly into data visualizations, letting you decide the best hire.
Who is it for? High-end hiring tasks for senior engineers and demanding situations.
The free trial lets you assess five candidates monthly. The Team package costs $99 monthly and increases your quota to 20 invites. Enterprise costs $399 monthly and allows unlimited invites.
HireVue is all about “unlocking human potential” through the power of AI. Users can administer virtual tryouts by video, send skills tests to candidates, or use gamified assessments.
AI aside, structured technical interviews are a standout feature of HireVue. Recruiters can video questions and tailor interviews for every candidate. This aids remote hiring, cuts bias, and saves time vetting candidates.
HireVue is not famous for its coding assessments. You can assess skills via tools. However, the testing library is comparatively limited.
Who is it for? General hiring processes that mix technical proficiency with other assessments. A good option for recruiting entry-level coders.
Users can sample HireVue via a free demo, but the hiring platform is costly. The Essential package starts at $35k per year, while enterprise starts at $75k. Not suitable for small or new businesses.
Mettl was founded in India in 2010 and has earned a global reputation for its comprehensive talent assessment capabilities. Mettl has a lot of features, allowing users to test over 600 skills and choose from over 100,000 questions.
Automatic grading and report generation keep recruiters informed, and the Mettl live interview platform dovetails neatly with tests. Bilingual testing helps when screening a global . You can also run simulations to find the right candidates for each position.
However, Mettl struggles with integrations, making it hard to slot coding tests into your hiring pipeline. And the cost can be excessive at volume, so it’s far from a flawless product.
Who is it for? Companies that test internal coding expertise and mid-level recruitment challenges.
Mettl offers a stripped-back free trial. The website does not detail paid package costs. However, tailored packages cost thousands of dollars per year.
Before we finish, it’s important to remember that testing platforms only work when used correctly. Hiring technical talent entails using the correct assessments at the right time. Let’s quickly explain how this works.
First, don’t focus solely on coding. Obviously, you need robust assurance of coding skills. However, successful hires also have the social and intellectual skills needed to fit your corporate culture.
Test for problem-solving and critical thinking abilities. Assess logical reasoning, communication skills, teamwork — anything that meets your ideal candidate profile.
Users should also customize tests to reflect real-world job tasks. This entails blending technical skills with problem-solving. Aim to mirror situations teams face as they meet deadlines and deliver critical services.
Remember: testing should filter candidates who can fill your specific role. Finding skilled or capable candidates is just the first step. A good testing platform lets you go deeper.
We recommend mixing digital tests with homework assignments. Home projects shed light on how developers organize time and deploy their skills. A promising developer on paper may struggle to meet deadlines. Homework identifies these problems before they occur in the workplace.
Skills testing is a crowded market, especially when finding your next tech superstar. As we’ve seen, testing platforms vary greatly in their core features, pros and cons, support, and pricing, making it crucial to pick the one that meets your unique business needs.
We think Toggl Hire ticks critical hiring boxes for most companies.
Our tests cover critical coding challenges, easy to administer, fun to take, and slot seamlessly into hiring pipelines. Recruiters can build custom assessments blending tech tasks and soft skills to find qualified talent.
Related questions
In India, hiring a hacker for unauthorized activities is illegal under the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 (amended in 2008) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Here's a breakdown of the legal implications:
1. IT Act Provisions:
- Section 43: Penalizes unauthorized access, damage, or theft of computer systems/data.
- Section 66: Criminalizes hacking, prescribing imprisonment up to 3 years and/or fines.
- Section 66C (Identity Theft) and 66D (Cheating by Personation): Apply if hacking involves impersonation or fraud.
- Section 72: Punishes breaches of privacy (e.g., accessing personal data without consent).
2. Indian Penal Code (IPC):
- Section 420 (Cheating), 383 (Extortion), and 408 (Criminal Breach of Trust): May apply if hacking involves fraud, blackmail, or data theft.
- Section 379 (Theft): Relevant if sensitive information is stolen.
3. Exceptions for Ethical Hacking:
- Hiring a hacker is legal only if:
- The individual is a certified ethical hacker (e.g., CEH certification).
- Explicit written consent is obtained from the system/network owner (e.g., penetration testing for cybersecurity).
- Unauthorized hacking, even for "good intentions" (e.g., recovering a hacked account), remains illegal.
4. Consequences:
- Criminal charges: Imprisonment (up to 3 years under IT Act, longer under IPC) and substantial fines.
- Civil liability: Compensation claims for damages caused by hacking.
Key Takeaway:
Hiring a hacker in India is legal only for authorized, ethical purposes (e.g., cybersecurity testing with permission). Any unauthorized activity, regardless of intent, violates cybercrime laws. Always consult legal experts and ensure compliance with the IT Act and IPC.
评论已关闭