Introduction:

2、Evaluation Methods of your HackerRank Tests
Creating a new Test ♂
HackerRank for Work allows hiring managers to create Tests to assess candidates. After candidates complete and submit the tests, the answers can be evaluated in HackerRank for assessing their skills and competence for the job.
Following are the two methods to create a test:
Creating a test based on a specific role
Based on your role selection, a test for that role is generated. HackerRank has bundled together questions from the HackerRank Library into a test for certain pre-defined roles.
Creating a custom test
Evaluation Methods of your HackerRank Tests ♂
Question Type
Evaluation Method
Coding
Automatic evaluation: Your code is validated for each test case. The output from your code is compared with the expected output to validate whether the test case has passed or failed.
The total score assigned to the candidate is the sum of scores of all the passed test cases.
Database Engineer
Automatic evaluation: The data retrieved by you is compared to the correct answer. If they match, a full score is awarded to the candidates. However, if they do not match, then the candidate receives a zero score.
HTML/CSS/JavaScript
Manual evaluation: The evaluator reviews the final webpage rendered by the candidate's code to verify how the page appears and responds. Based on the evaluation, a relevant score is assigned manually.
DevOps
Automatic evaluation: The test setter provides a Check script (written in Bash) to validate if you have performed the correct tasks. Based on the output of the Check script, a score is assigned automatically.
Java Project
Automatic evaluation: You are evaluated based on the number of unit tests that pass.
Your score for a question= (Number of unit tests passed/Total number of unit tests)* Total score.
Approximate Solution
Automatic evaluation: The evaluator writes a custom checker specifying the scoring logic for these questions. For each test case, the custom checker is run to get the score. The sum of the scores returned by the custom checker for each test case is your total score.
Multiple Choice
Automatic evaluation: Your responses are compared to the correct answer for scoring the question. By default, the score assigned to one multiple choice question is 5. If there is more than one correct answer for a question, then each correct answer is assigned an equal fraction of the total score.
The evaluator might also enable negative marking for wrong answers to ensure that candidates do not indulge in guessing.
Sentence completion
Automatic evaluation: To evaluate the score for a question, the fraction of correctly answered blanks to the total number of blanks is multiplied by the total score for the question.
Subjective
Manual evaluation: The evaluator is required to read your answers, review diagrams, and explanations to assign scores manually.
Diagram
File Upload
Front-end, Back-end, and Full-stack development
Automatic evaluation - Based on J-unit based test scoring or custom scoring:
In J-unit based test scoring, there is an equal score assigned to each test case. The candidate receives a score that is proportional to the number of test cases that the code pass.
Related questions
When discussing "legit hackers for hire," it’s crucial to clarify that ethical hacking services are legal and legitimate when conducted by certified professionals for authorized purposes, such as cybersecurity testing, vulnerability assessments, or penetration testing. However, hiring individuals for unauthorized or illegal activities (e.g., hacking into systems without permission) is unethical and illegal worldwide.
Legitimate Cybersecurity Services (2019 Context):
In 2019, reputable platforms and companies offered ethical hacking services, including:
- Bug Bounty Platforms:
- HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Synack connected businesses with vetted security researchers to identify vulnerabilities in exchange for rewards.
- Cybersecurity Firms:
- Companies like IBM Security, Trustwave, or Kaspersky provided penetration testing and security audits.
- Freelance Ethical Hackers:
- Platforms like Upwork or Fiverr sometimes listed certified professionals (e.g., CEH, OSCP holders) for hire, though vetting was essential.
Red Flags & Risks:
- Illegal Services: Websites or forums claiming to offer "hacking for hire" (e.g., hacking social media, altering grades, or unauthorized access) are scams or engage in criminal activity.
- Scams: Many "hackers" advertised on the dark web or unverified forums take payment and disappear or extort victims.
- Legal Consequences: Participating in unauthorized hacking violates laws like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) in the U.S. or similar laws globally.
How to Stay Safe & Legal:
- Hire Certified Professionals: Look for credentials like Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), OSCP, or CISSP.
- Use Reputable Platforms: Stick to well-known cybersecurity firms or bug bounty programs.
- Verify Authorization: Ensure any penetration testing or security work is contractually authorized.
- Avoid Dark Web/Shady Forums: These are hubs for illegal activity and scams.
Resources for Ethical Hacking (2019):
- EC-Council: Offered CEH certification and resources.
- Offensive Security: Provided OSCP certification and training.
- OWASP: Open-source project for security best practices.
If you need cybersecurity assistance today, consult a licensed IT security firm or certified professional. For legal advice, contact an attorney.

评论已关闭