Introduction：
1、Exploring the Role of Ethical Hackers in Cyber Security
2、Why Companies Should Embrace Ethical Hackers
Exploring the Role of Ethical Hackers in Cyber Security ♂
In today's digital world where companies, governments and individuals rely on the Internet for everything from communication to banking, cyber security has never been more important. As cyber threats continue to evolve, traditional defense mechanisms are no longer sufficient to protect sensitive information and infrastructure. This is where the ethical hunters come in. These cyber security experts, known as white hat hackers, are at the forefront of protecting systems from malicious threats. Let's dive deeper into the role of ethical hacking in cyber security and why they are so important to protecting the digital world.
What is ethical hacking in Cyber Security?
Ethical hacking refers to the process of probing systems, networks, and applications to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses—just like a malicious hacker—but with permission and the right topic. The goal of ethical hacking is to strengthen security by finding and fixing vulnerabilities before cybercriminals can exploit them.
Unlike black hat (public) hackers and gray hat hackers (who may not follow legal boundaries and regulations), ethical hackers work under a legal contract that uses organizations to re-do tests and assessments. To ensure the security of their systems
The Role of Ethical Hackers in Cyber Security
1. Pen testing
Penetration testing is one of the most important responsibilities of ethical hunters. This includes comparing cyber attacks to systems to identify security vulnerabilities. By imitating the techniques, methods, and procedures (TTP) used by real hackers, ethical hackers can uncover vulnerabilities that might otherwise have been overlooked.
Pen testing can be done on different aspects of the organization's structure, such as:
Web Testing: Testing websites and web platforms for vulnerabilities such as injection SQL, cross scripting (XSS) and other vulnerabilities
Network Security: Review network defenses to ensure protection from threats such as malware, phishing and data breaches.
Physical security: identify weaknesses in access control systems and security infrastructure.
By identifying vulnerabilities early, ethical hackers help organizations protect their data and prevent catastrophic breaches.
2. Unit Updating
Ethical hackers also perform regular vulnerability assessments and scan systems for known security flaws. These assessments are designed to identify outdated software, missing updates, and configuration errors that may expose your system. They can use automated tools alongside manual methods to ensure that potential vulnerabilities are detected.
When vulnerabilities are identified, ethical hackers and security teams work together to assist in remediation based on the level of risk associated with each vulnerability, and ensure that the critical vulnerability.
3. Terror Response and Threat Response
ethical hacking in cyber security plays an important role in incident response and threat detection. When an organization faces a cyber attack, ethical hackers help investigate the nature of the attack, exploits and how to mitigate the damage. They also help organizations improve faster by providing recommendations to improve their security posture.
Bullying detection is an active search for signs of suspicious or malicious activity on a network. Ethical hackers use advanced tools and techniques to detect anomalies and identify threats that may not be detected by automated security solutions.
4. Security Awareness and Education
Another important role for ethical hacking in cyber security is to educate organizations about cyber threats. They conduct security training, simulate phishing attacks and increase awareness of cyber security practices so that employees know how to avoid the intrusion of cyber crime. Ethical trainers help organizations strengthen their security measures by training employees to spot threats such as phishing emails, weak passwords and social engineering techniques.
5. Development of security tools and solutions
Ethical activists also contribute to the development of new security tools and methods. Their in-depth knowledge of cyber threats allows them to create detection and protection systems and improve cyber security. Many ethical activists contribute to the open community by sharing their findings and developing tools that the cybersecurity community can use to protect themselves.
The Importance of Ethical Stakeholders
1. Support the Documentation
Although most companies involved in cyber security are reactive - to Incidents that respond after the event. - Ethical advocates Help organizations to follow the position. They predict potential threats, identify vulnerabilities and fix them before attackers can exploit them. This proactive approach helps reduce the damage caused by cyber attacks and ensures that one system is always in front of malicious actors.
2. Avoid Financial and Reputational Damage
A successful cyber attack can cause significant financial loss and long-term reputational damage to business. Ethical hackers prevent this by ensuring systems are secure and help organizations recover quickly from security incidents. They also assist with compliance and help businesses meet safety standards and avoid penalties.
3. Government CyberSecurity Skills Gap
There is a growing shortage of cybersecurity professionals, and organizations are constantly looking for qualified professionals to protect their systems. Ethical activists not only help organizations by securing systems, but also act as mentors and role models for the next generation of cyber professionals. Their work encourages young professionals to enter the field of ethical hacking and helps equip them with cyber security skills.
4. Build trust and credibility
Ethical stakeholders help companies build trust with their customers, stakeholders and managers. By hiring ethical practitioners to perform security assessments, organizations can demonstrate their commitment to cybersecurity and their commitment to protecting sensitive data. This trust is important to maintain a good reputation and ensure customer loyalty.
Tools and Techniques for Ethical Vulnerability
Ethical hackers rely on a variety of tools and techniques to identify and exploit system vulnerabilities. Some of the most commonly used tools are:
Nmap: A network scanning tool that helps hackers map networks, identify active devices, and identify security vulnerabilities.
Metasploit: A penetration testing tool that allows ethical hackers to simulate real attacks and assess the security of systems.
Wireshark: A network protocol analyzer that collects and examines packets to identify potential flaws in network communications.
Burp Suite: A popular tool used to find and patch vulnerabilities in web applications, such as XSS or SQL injection.
Conclusion
Ethical hackers are the heroes of cyber security who work hard to protect organizations from ever-evolving cyber threats. They play an important role in helping businesses, governments and individuals protect their digital assets, data and infrastructure. As cyber threats increase in complexity, the demand for ethical hacking in cyber security will increase. Through proactive activities such as penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, incident response and education, ethical activists contribute to creating a safer digital world for all. Connect with CyberCorp for a better security state in your system. Contact Now.
Why Companies Should Embrace Ethical Hackers ♂
For years, there has been a strange dynamic between independent security researchers and their research subjects, which are usually businesses with a reputation to consider. While revealing security vulnerabilities is a necessary and crucial service, it tends to put the company with the security issue on the defensive. That, in turn, often results in belligerence rather than gratitude. Case in point: A recent LinkedIn post from a security researcher who had legally purchased a traffic control system on eBay to test it for vulnerabilities. He found a critical vulnerability that “allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to bypass security and gain full control of a traffic controller.”
This researcher wasn’t out for money – he just wanted to attach his name to a CVE. He thus reached out to the manufacturer to alert them of his findings. In response, the manufacturer sent the legal team after him.
Unfortunately, this has been going on for years. Instead of thanking security guys for information that could save some money – or at least their reputations – companies often lawyered up and went on the attack. Good people trying to do good things were taken to court, fined, or even jailed.
And let’s be clear: security researchers (or hackers, take your pick) are generally good people motivated by curiosity, not malicious intent. Making guesses, taking chances, learning new things, and trying and failing and trying again is fun. The love of the game and ethical principles are two separate things, but many researchers have both in spades.
Unfortunately, the government has historically sided with corporations. Scared by the Matthew Broderick movie WarGames plot, Ronald Reagan initiated legislation that resulted in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (CFAA). Good-faith researchers have been haunted ever since. Then there is The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, which made it explicitly illegal to “circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under [copyright law],” something necessary to study many products.
A narrow harbor for those engaging in encryption research was carved out in the DMCA, but otherwise, the law put researchers further in danger of legal action against them.
All this naturally had a chilling effect as researchers grew tired of being abused for doing the right thing. Many researchers stopped bothering with private disclosures to companies with vulnerable products and took their findings straight to the public. This was a far worse situation for the companies. Embarrassed by the bad publicity, more and more of them decided that positively engaging with ethical hackers was better than threatening legal action.
Over time, the relationship between companies and the security community improved as companies became more open to hearing about their products’ vulnerabilities. Security communities helped companies understand what good security looks like and what practices were needed to keep their systems secure and safe. Remember, in the old days (and some might argue even still today), developers tended to only concern themselves with making code that worked. Security was simply not on the minds of most developers or the companies they worked for.
Eventually, things improved enough for both sides to work together for the common good. Some companies even realized they could bolster their security posture by offering financial rewards to outside researchers who shared their findings quietly. The first bug bounty was launched in 1983 by Hunter & Ready (or in 1995 by Netscape, depending on who you ask), but these kinds of programs didn’t start taking off until the early 2000s. These days, the more prominent tech companies tend to have their own bug bounty programs or at least sponsor ones through organizations like HackerOne. However, as of 2021, only 20% of Fortune 500 companies had a vulnerability disclosure policy (VDP) that provides researchers with a map of what they are legally safe to study and how they should disclose their findings. Small to midsize businesses (SMBs) haven’t been studied, but I think it’s safe to say that the number of those companies with VDPs is much lower.
Meanwhile, security researchers continue to face legal risks. In a study done in 2017, 23% of researchers said they’d experienced some kind of legal threat as a result of their work, and 38% agreed that concerns with legal challenges had led them to avoid studying a particular target. This same study also examined how companies responded to researcher requests for authorization to test their products. Unsurprisingly, most didn’t respond, even after an escalated follow-up with certified letters from researchers to corporate legal departments. Of the minority of companies that did respond, less than half conditionally or unconditionally granted authorization to the researchers.
Clearly, the “old days” aren’t that old. This must change. Incentivizing (or at least not actively disincentivizing) security researchers to do security research is a solid net good for the public, government, and corporations. If you’re a company that does not actively have a program allowing the public to submit security findings, you should reconsider. If the security community is willing to spend time finding and sharing security issues, you should thank them, not attack them!
评论已关闭